Re: Project granted credit comparison
James, Sun Apr 29 2007, 10:19AM

The projects have to be using the latest export code. If they don't export the tag on the hosts, I can't do the comparison for them. The other reason would be that they need to have active hosts. Projects like Rederfarm will probably drop off the comparison soon unless they come back online.

Re: Project granted credit comparison
Nightbird, Sun Apr 29 2007, 02:37PM

Thanks for your answer
Ehm, an other question about the latest export code.
Does it mean that the projects need to use the latest Boinc server software or what cvs version do you need ?

Re: Project granted credit comparison
James, Mon Apr 30 2007, 08:14AM

I don't think the server side has any code tags. But checking the checkin_notes file, the option needed to be in this comparison is server side code from code after January 12, 2007. And the code isn't under CVS any more. They recently switched to Subversion.

Re: Project granted credit comparison
SargeD, Tue Jan 15 2008, 11:41AM

I have a question as well. You are showing Riesel Sieve as giving 4.3 times the credit of SETI. I happen to run both projects and cannot fathom how you came up with this figure. Based on my own comparisons using 4 different machines and 2 operating systems I only see about 1.4 to 1.5 difference on the average. Care to explain how you came up with your figures?